A Conversation With a Swedish Translator on the Art of Voice
Stockholm at dawn has a particular kind of stillness. Light slants across a stack of books, a cup of coffee losing its heat too fast, a man bent low over a sentence. I’m sitting opposite Erik Nylund, a Swedish translator of English-language literary fiction, and he’s telling me about a moment of crisis over a single word.
“It was sorrow,” he says. “Not grief, not sadness. Sorrow. In Swedish we have sorg, but it carries a slightly different weight. Leans toward mourning. The character wasn’t mourning. She was inhabiting something quieter, a more private ache. I needed a word that didn’t announce itself.”
We’re here to talk about voice—that elusive thing that lets a translation breathe with the same lungs as the original. For Nylund, voice isn’t one element you can transplant. It’s a confluence of rhythm, register, and a hundred tiny choices that pile up into a presence on the page.

The Translator as Listener
Nylund has been at this for over twenty years. His work runs from the brittle minimalism of Rachel Cusk, through the humid density of Jesmyn Ward, to the controlled fury of Ian McEwan. Each author, he says, demands a different way of listening.
“With Cusk, the voice is almost architectural. Every sentence is a load-bearing wall. Misplace one beam and the whole structure tilts. With Ward, the voice is more like weather—heat, wind, the pressure before a storm. I have to find Swedish words that carry that same atmospheric weight.”
He calls his process a kind of deep eavesdropping. Before he translates a single line, he reads the entire novel aloud in English. He listens for cadence, for the spots where the prose speeds up or goes quiet. He marks passages where the syntax does something odd. Only then does he start writing.
“People think translation is about knowing two languages,” he says. “It’s really about knowing two silences. The silence inside the English sentence, and the silence inside the Swedish one. They’re never the same shape.”

The Weight of a Word
We keep circling back to sorrow. Nylund eventually picked saknad, a Swedish word that suggests absence—a hollowed-out space where something used to be. Not a direct match, but it caught the emotional architecture of the scene. The character wasn’t just sad; she was missing something she couldn’t name.
“A translator is always making bargains,” he says. “You trade a little denotation for connotation. Sacrifice a sound to save a rhythm. Sometimes you lose a metaphor entirely and have to build a new one from local materials.”
He points to a line from a novel he translated last year. The original English read: “The sky was the color of a bruise that had not yet healed.” In Swedish, a literal version would have been clumsy—too medical. He rewrote it as: “Himlen hade färgen av ett slag som ännu inte bleknat.” The sky had the color of a blow that hadn’t yet faded. The violence of the image transferred, just through a different door.
Dialect, Class, and the Untranslatable
Voice is social, too. Nylund talks about the difficulty of translating working-class London speech into Swedish, a language with a flatter class register. In English, a dropped h or a swallowed t can signal a whole background. Swedish doesn’t offer those same phonetic markers.
“You can’t reproduce the dialect,” he says. “So you reproduce the effect of the dialect. You use simpler syntax, shorter words, a more direct grammar. You make the character sound like someone who doesn’t have the luxury of elaborate sentences.”
He recalls a passage where a character says, “I ain’t got nothing.” A Swedish equivalent, “Jag har ingenting,” is grammatically correct and emotionally flat. His fix was to write, “Jag har inte ett dugg.” I don’t have a speck. It lost the double negative but gained a colloquial bite that fit the character’s voice.

When the Author Disagrees
Authors don’t always see their own voice clearly. Nylund describes a tense back-and-forth with a British novelist who objected to his translation of a recurring phrase. The original used the word queer in an older, non-sexual sense—meaning strange, off-kilter. Nylund had used the Swedish word underlig, which carries no modern sexual connotation. The author worried the nuance of queerness was lost.
“I had to explain that underlig in Swedish is closer to eerie or uncanny. It actually intensified the strangeness she wanted. But she was attached to the English word as a cultural object. The translation felt like a betrayal.”
They eventually compromised on besynnerlig, a word that sits somewhere between peculiar and queer. The lesson, Nylund says, is that voice isn’t always what the author thinks it is. Sometimes the translator hears things the author didn’t know were there.
The Loneliness and the Long Game
Translation is solitary work. Nylund spends months inside a single book, speaking its sentences under his breath, dreaming in its rhythms. When the work is done, the book goes out into the world under someone else’s name. The translator’s name shows up in small type on the copyright page.
“You have to be comfortable with invisibility,” he says. “But also with a strange kind of intimacy. I know these characters more thoroughly than most readers. I’ve held every word they speak in my mouth. That’s a private reward.”
He tells me about a letter he got from a Swedish reader who’d never read the English original. The reader said the book felt as though it had been written in Swedish from the start. That, Nylund says, is the highest compliment. Not that the translation is accurate, but that it feels native.
FAQ: Translating Literary Voice
What makes a translation faithful to the original voice?
Faithfulness isn’t about word-for-word accuracy. It’s about preserving the emotional and rhythmic DNA of the original. A faithful translation reproduces the effect of the voice—its speed, its temperature, its silences—even when the words change.
Can a translation ever be better than the original?
Nylund hesitates at this one. “Better is the wrong word,” he says. “A translation can reveal something latent in the original. It can clarify a metaphor, tighten a rhythm, sharpen an image. But that’s not superiority. It’s a different kind of attention.” He mentions that Gabriel García Márquez reportedly preferred Gregory Rabassa’s English translation of One Hundred Years of Solitude to his own Spanish. The translator had become a second author.
How do translators handle humor and wordplay?
Humor is the hardest element to carry across languages. Puns rarely survive. Nylund’s approach is to find a joke that performs the same function in the scene. If a character uses wordplay to deflect tension, the translation has to create a Swedish wordplay that also deflects tension. The content shifts; the dramatic purpose stays put.
Is there a Swedish literary voice that influences your translations?
Nylund cites the Swedish poet Tomas Tranströmer, whose compressed, image-driven language taught him the power of restraint. “Tranströmer can say in four words what English needs a paragraph for. I carry that economy into my translations. Swedish can be a very lean language. Sometimes I have to resist the temptation to make the English too spare.”
What advice would you give to someone starting out in literary translation?
“Read the book until you can hear it with your eyes closed. Then translate it as though you’re writing it for a friend who’ll never read the original. Don’t try to impress anyone. Try to be true to the voice that’s speaking, even when it speaks in a language you have to invent.”
Before I leave, Nylund shows me a sentence he’s been working on all week. It’s from a novel still unpublished in Swedish. The English reads: “She waited in the way a house waits for its people to return.” In his notebook, he’s written and crossed out nine versions. The tenth reads: “Hon väntade som ett hus väntar på att få sina människor tillbaka.” He reads it aloud, testing the weight of tillbaka at the end. He nods once, almost imperceptibly. The voice is there.















